What is the significance of fall of southeast asian colonies




















SEA didn't fall, it's still there. Southeast Asian colonies fell through the center of the earth and went bye bye forever. Southeast Asia has a tropical climate year round. It is usually hot, humid, and has plenty of rain fall. Like dominoes the entire region would fall. The significance of the fall of the fall of Constantinople is that it was the fall of the last christian empire in eastern Europe.

It was called the Domino Theory, because just as a domino falls and causes the next one to fall, so to would the other Southeast Asian countries fall if Vietnam fell. Dwight D. They were poorly defended with the exception of Singapore and the Japanese had crippled the largest Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor. They were poorly defended with the exception of Singapore and the Japanese had crippled the largest pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor.

The official reason was to prevent the spread of communism. It was believed and feared that if Vietnam was lost to communism, a domino effect would result and all of Southeast Asia would fall to communism. The opposition statement was that the loss of southeast Asia to communism would negatively impact American commercial interests. Asia is the largest land mass of all the continents, thus, it would receive the most rainfall The Domino Theory hypothesised that the fall of Vietnam to communism would act like a 'domino', inciting communist revolutions throughout Southeast Asia.

Southeast Asia mainly has a hot and humid tropical climate throughout the year and a large amount of rainfall. The only major region in this area with a subtropical climate is Northern Vietnam which is cold in the winter. The only other smaller areas that fall outside this dominant climate are the mountainous northern region, which has a milder, drier climate and certain parts of the region that are deserts. The Domino Theory described the political ideology during the Korean War, that if South Korea fell to the Communists, the other free states of Southeast Asia would fall to Communism as well.

Asia you will see coming soon to Asia passific type in Google fusion fall Asia then click the first one on top. World prices for lead and zinc fell during the late s as a result of Asian monetary crises and resultant slowdowns and outright stoppages of production in southeast Asia. Log in. Southeast Asia. Study now. See Answer. Best Answer. African colonies were totally different; they were based on race apartheid. Study guides. Oceans and Seas 22 cards. What is the most populous country in Asia.

What is the capital of China. In what country is the Yangtze River located. What is the worlds largest country. Buddhism 22 cards. How long is the great wall of china in miles. What religions began in India. What merged with native cultures on the Indian subcontinent to form Hinduism. What were some aspects of Chinese isolationism. Africa 20 cards. In which country is the highest mountain peak on earth located. South Africa's natural resources. How did the rwandan genocide begin.

What Ocean borders the most continents. Q: What was the significance of the fall of southeast Asia colonies? Write your answer Their commitment to the military effort to expand Japanese territory to achieve economic security can be understood partly in these terms. The depression ended in the mids in Japan partly because of government deficits used to expand greatly both heavy industry and the military.

Internationally, this was a time when "free trade" was in disrepute. The great powers not only jealously protected their special economic rights within their colonies and spheres of influence, but sought to bolster their sagging economies through high tariffs, dumping of goods, and other trade manipulation. The Japanese, with few natural resources, sought to copy this pattern. They used cutthroat trade practices to sell textiles and other light industrial goods in the East Asian and U.

They also developed sources of raw materials and heavy industry in the colonies they established in Korea, Taiwan and Manchuria. Japan used high tariffs to limit imports of American and European industrial products. The Japanese military faced a particular tactical problem in that certain critical raw materials — especially oil and rubber — were not available within the Japanese sphere of influence.

Instead, Japan received most of its oil from the United States and rubber from British Malaya, the very two Western nations trying to restrict Japan's expansion. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's embargo of oil exports to Japan pressured the Japanese navy, which had stocks for only about six months of operations.

The Japanese army, for its part, was originally concerned with fighting the Soviet Union, because of the army's preoccupation with Manchuria and China. The Japanese army governed Manchuria indirectly through the "puppet" state of Manchukuo and developed heavy industry there under its favorite agencies, disliking and distrusting the zaibatsu large Japanese corporations. But the Soviet army's resistance to Japanese attacks was sufficient to discourage northern expansion.

Meanwhile in , the intensification of Chinese resistance to the pressure of the Japanese military drew Japan into a draining war in the vast reaches of China proper, and in into operations in French Indochina, far to the south. Thus, when the navy pressed for a "southern" strategy of attacking Dutch Indonesia to get its oil and British Malaya to control its rubber, the army agreed.

While it seems that economic factors were important in Japanese expansion in East Asia, it would be too much to say that colonialism, trade protection, and the American embargo compelled Japan to take this course. Domestic politics, ideology and racism also played a role.

The political structure of Japan at this time was inherited from the Meiji era and was increasingly dominated by the military. During the Meiji period, the government was controlled by a small ruling group of elder statesmen who had overthrown the shogun and established the new centralized Japanese state. These men used their position to coordinate the bureaucracy, the military, the parliament, the Imperial Household, and other branches of government.

Following their deaths in the early s, no single governmental institution was able to establish full control, until the Manchurian Incident, when Japan took control of Manchuria. This began a process in which the military behaved autonomously on the Asian mainland and with increasing authority in politics at home.

From on, Japan was at war with China. The wartime regime used existing government controls on public opinion, including schools and textbooks, the media, and the police, but Japan continued to have more of an authoritarian government than a totalitarian one like Hitler's Germany.

In particular, the government was never able to gain real control of the economy and the great zaibatsu, which were more interested in the economic opportunities provided by the military's policies than in submitting loyally to a patriotic mission.

The emperor has been criticized for not taking a more forceful action to restrain his government, especially in light of his own known preference for peace, but Japanese emperors after the Meiji Restoration had "reigned but not ruled. The doubts are strengthened in light of the difficulty the emperor had in forcing the military to accept surrender after the atomic bombings.

The emperor's decision at that point to bring agreement among his advisers was an extraordinary event in Japanese history. The emperor-based ideology of Japan during World War II was a relatively new creation, dating from the efforts of Meiji oligarchs to unite the nation in response to the Western challenge.

Before the Meiji Restoration, the emperor wielded no political power and was viewed simply as a symbol of the Japanese culture. Westerners of that time knew him only as a shadowy figure somewhat like a pope. The people were not allowed to look at the emperor, or even to speak his name; patriotism had been raised to the unassailable level of sacredness.

It is sometimes difficult to comprehend the extreme sacrifices the Japanese made in the name of the emperor. This can perhaps best be viewed, however, as extreme patriotism — Japanese were taught to give their lives, if necessary, for their emperor. But this was not entirely different from the Americans who gave their lives in the same war for their country and the "American" way. The kamikaze pilots, who were named for the "divine wind" kami kaze that destroyed the Mongol fleet in the thirteenth century and saved Japan from invasion, might be compared to the young Iranian soldiers fighting in suicide squadrons in the Iran-Iraq war of the s, or even to fanatical Shiites responsible for the truck bombing of the U.

Lebanese embassy in The Japanese were proud of their many accomplishments and resented racial slurs they met with in some Western nations. Their attempt to establish a statement of racial equality in the Covenant of the League of Nations was vetoed by the United States because of opposition in California and Great Britain Australian resistance.

The Japanese greatly resented this. The Japanese military was convinced of the willingness of its people to go to any sacrifice for their nation, and it was contemptuous of the "softness" of the U.

The military's overconfidence in its own abilities and underestimation of the will of these other nations were thus rooted in its own misleading ethnic and racial stereotypes. While Asians, the Japanese saw themselves as less representatives of Asia than Asia's champion. They sought to liberate Asian colonies from the Westerners, whom they disdained.

But although the Japanese were initially welcomed in some Asian colonies by the indigenous populations whom they "liberated" from European domination, the arrogance and racial prejudice displayed by the Japanese military governments in these nations created great resentment.

This resentment is still evident in some Southeast Asian nations. The World at War: Discussion Questions. Today Japan and the United States are close allies. But between and , they fought a bitter and bloody war, which many people remember well today.

Why did they fight this war? The answer on the American side is simple: the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000